Monday, September 05, 2005

terror or anarchy?

During a conversation I was having yesterday, a friend of mine (in a tongue of the slip) referred to the main protagonist in Alan Moore’s V for Vendetta as terrorist. Ears were perked up, I felt that he should be referred to as an anarchist, not a terrorist. Calling him a terrorist would be glorifying all the ****head jihadis. C’mon let’s not insult V by calling him a terrorist; anarchists deserve that much at least. And what do terrorists deserve? That’s a question for another day.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

For the terrorist the final pit stop definately should be Hell..But on the contrary..a person who has the guts to give up his life for a cause,which can be anything..deserves something a lil better ..whaddya say?
-Anon

shenoy said...

a person who has the guts to give up his life for a cause, somebody like a suicide bomber you mean?

Santosh said...

>>>Calling him a terrorist would be glorifying all the ****head jihadis. C’mon let’s not insult V by calling him a terrorist; anarchists deserve that much at least.
Amen, brother.