Monday, September 05, 2005
terror or anarchy?
During a conversation I was having yesterday, a friend of mine (in a tongue of the slip) referred to the main protagonist in Alan Moore’s V for Vendetta as terrorist. Ears were perked up, I felt that he should be referred to as an anarchist, not a terrorist. Calling him a terrorist would be glorifying all the ****head jihadis. C’mon let’s not insult V by calling him a terrorist; anarchists deserve that much at least. And what do terrorists deserve? That’s a question for another day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
For the terrorist the final pit stop definately should be Hell..But on the contrary..a person who has the guts to give up his life for a cause,which can be anything..deserves something a lil better ..whaddya say?
-Anon
a person who has the guts to give up his life for a cause, somebody like a suicide bomber you mean?
>>>Calling him a terrorist would be glorifying all the ****head jihadis. C’mon let’s not insult V by calling him a terrorist; anarchists deserve that much at least.
Amen, brother.
Post a Comment